Interpretation praeter legem
Interpretation praeter legem
Author: Ginta Sniedzīte
Likums un Tiesības, 2005.gada oktobris (Nr. 74), novembris (Nr. 75), decembris (Nr. 76)
Summary
The main objective of the article is
to demonstrate and establish legal method praeter legem to be
interpretative method not the one involved with the further law-making. In this
respect author introduce a new approach to the legal understanding of the
method praeter legem. In order to accomplish the purpose, the substance
of the legal method praeter legem is clarified. Positions of numerous
valued foreign law scholars are codified in schemes and analysed thoroughly as
well as those represented in local legal scholastics. As a result the legal method praeter legem is
established as a legal method to be used for indefinite legal concepts in order
to discover and concretise their meaning and true essence. In the prospective continued
publications the author will develop the research with the review of the
necessary set of implementation circumstances and legitimation demands
presented for the interpretation praeter legem, and the analysis of three
kinds of indefinite legal concepts (open legal terms, general clauses and
designates) and justification of the need for such concepts to be included in
legal texts. Likewise author will elaborate legal and doctrinal conditions to
be met and strict step-by-step methodology to be followed for legitimate
implementation of the interpretation praeter legem. Finally, she will analyse the suitable
instruments – judge-made law and legal doctrine, and justified practises to use
these instruments for discovering the appropriate substance of identified legal
concepts.
You may download this article in Latvian here

